ABECMA Dispersion for infusion Ref.[49954] Active ingredients: Idecabtagene vicleucel

Source: European Medicines Agency (EU)  Revision Year: 2022  Publisher: Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharma EEIG, Plaza 254, Blanchardstown Corporate Park 2, Dublin 15, D15 T867, Ireland

5.1. Pharmacodynamic properties

Pharmacotherapeutic group: not yet assigned
ATC code: not yet assigned

Mechanism of action

Abecma is a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-positive T cell therapy targeting B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), which is expressed on the surface of normal and malignant plasma cells. The CAR construct includes an anti-BCMA scFv-targeting domain for antigen specificity, a transmembrane domain, a CD3-zeta T cell activation domain, and a 4-1BB costimulatory domain. Antigen-specific activation of Abecma results in CAR-positive T cell proliferation, cytokine secretion and subsequent cytolytic killing of BCMA-expressing cells.

Clinical efficacy and safety

KarMMa was an open-label, single-arm, multicentre study that evaluated the efficacy and safety of Abecma in adult patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma who had received at least 3 prior antimyeloma therapies including an immunomodulatory agent, a proteasome inhibitor and an anti-CD38 antibody and who were refractory to the last treatment regimen. Patients with CNS involvement of myeloma, a history of other BCMA targeting therapies, allogeneic SCT or prior gene therapy based or other genetically modified T cell therapy were excluded. Patients with a history of CNS disorders (such as seizures), inadequate hepatic, renal, bone marrow function, cardiac, pulmonary function or ongoing treatment with immunosuppressants were excluded.

The study consisted of pre-treatment (screening, leukapheresis and bridging therapy [if needed]); treatment (lymphodepleting chemotherapy and Abecma infusion); and posttreatment (ongoing) for a minimum of 24 months following Abecma infusion or until documented disease progression, whichever was longer. The lymphodepleting chemotherapy period was one 3-day cycle of cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m² IV infusion daily for 3 days) and fludarabine (30 mg/m² IV infusion daily for 3 days) starting 5 days prior to the target infusion date of Abecma. Patients were hospitalised for 14 days after infusion of Abecma to monitor and manage potential CRS and neurotoxicity.

Of the 140 patients who were enrolled (i.e. underwent leukapheresis), 128 patients received the Abecma infusion. Out of the 140 patients, only one did not receive the product due to manufacturing failure. Eleven other patients were not treated with Abecma, due to physician decision (n=3), patient withdrawal (n=4), adverse events (n=1), progressive disease (n=1) or death (n=2) prior to receiving Abecma.

Anticancer therapy for disease control (bridging) was permitted between apheresis and lymphodepletion with the last dose being administered at least 14 days prior to initiation of lymphodepleting chemotherapy. Of the 128 patients treated with Abecma, most patients (87.5%) received anticancer therapy for disease control at the discretion of the investigator.

The doses targeted in the clinical study were 150, 300 or 450 × 106 CAR-positive T cells per infusion. The allowed dose range was 150 to 540 × 106 CAR-positive T cells. Table 4 below shows the target dose levels used in the clinical study based on total CAR-positive T cells and the corresponding range of actual dose administered defined as CAR-positive viable T cells.

Table 4. Total CAR-positive T cells dose with the corresponding dose range of CAR-positive viable T cells (x106):

Target dose based on total CAR-positive T
cells, including both viable and non-viable
cells (x106)
CAR-positive viable T cells (x106)
(min, max)
150 133 to 181
300 254 to 299
450 307 to 485

Table 5 summarises the baseline patient and disease characteristics for the enrolled and treated population in study.

Table 5. Baseline demographic/disease characteristics for study population:

CharacteristicTotal enrolled
(N=140)
Total treated
(N=128)
Age (years)   
Median (min, max) 60.5 (33, 78) 60.5 (33, 78)
≥65 years, n (%) 48 (34.3) 45 (35.2)
≥75 years, n (%) 5 (3.6) 4 (3.1)
Gender, male, n (%) 82 (58.6) 76 (59.4)
Race, n (%)   
Asian 3 (2.1) 3 (2.3)
Black 8 (5.7) 6 (4.7)
White 113 (80.7) 103 (80.5)
ECOG performance status, n (%)   
0 60 (42.9) 57 (44.5)
1 77 (55.0) 68 (53.1)
2a 3 (2.1) 3 (2.3)
Patients with extramedullary
plasmacytoma, n (%)
52 (37.1) 50 (39.1)
Time since initial diagnosis
(years), median (min, max)
6 (1.0, 17.9) 6 (1.0, 17.9)
Prior stem cell transplant, n (%) 131 (93.6) 120 (93.8)
Baseline cytogenetic high riskb,c 46 (32.9) 45 (35.2)
Revised ISS stage at baseline
(derived)d, n (%)
  
Stage Ι 14 (10.0) 14 (10.9)
Stage ΙΙ 97 (69.3) 90 (70.3)
Stage IIΙ 26 (18.6) 21 (16.4)
Unknown 3 (2.1) 3 (2.3)
Number of prior anti-myeloma
therapiese, median (min, max)
6 (3, 17) 6 (3, 16)
Triple refractoryf, n (%) 117 (83.6) 108 (84.4)
Creatinine clearance (mL/min), n (%)   
<30 3 (2.1) 1 (0.8)
30 to <45 9 (6.4) 8 (6.3)
45 to <60 13 (9.3) 10 (7.8)
60 to <80 38 (27.1) 36 (28.1)
≥80 77 (55.0) 73 (57.0)

max = maximum; min = minimum
a These patients had ECOG scores of <2 at screening for eligibility but subsequently deteriorated to ECOG scores of ≥2 at baseline prior to start of LD chemotherapy.
b Baseline cytogenetic abnormality was based on baseline cytogenetics from central laboratory if available. If central laboratory was not available or was unknown, cytogenetics prior to screening was used.
c High-risk defined as deletion in chromosome 17p (del[17p]), translocation involving chromosomes 4 and 14 (t[4;14]) or translocation involving chromosomes 14 and 16 (t[14;16]).
d Revised ISS was derived using baseline ISS stage, cytogenic abnormality and serum lactate dehydrogenase.
e Induction with or without haematopoietic stem cell transplant and with or without maintenance therapy was considered a single therapy.
f Triple refractory is defined as refractory to an immunomodulatory agent, a proteasome inhibitor and an anti-CD38 antibody.

The median time from leukapheresis to product availability was 32 days (range: 24 to 55 days) and the median time from leukapheresis to infusion was 40 days (range: 33 to 79 days). The median actual dose received across all doses targeted in the clinical study was 315.3 × 106 CAR-positive T cells (range 150.5 to 518.4).

Efficacy was assessed on the basis of overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR) rate and duration of response (DOR), as determined by an independent review committee. Other efficacy endpoints included minimal residual disease (MRD) using next-generation sequencing (NGS).

Efficacy results across doses targeted in the clinical study (150 to 450 × 106 CAR-positive T cells) are shown in the Table 6. Median follow-up was 19.9 months for all Abecma treated patients.

Table 6. Summary of efficacy based on the KarMMa study:

 Enrolleda
(N=140)
Treated population
Target dose of Abecma (CAR-positive T cells)
150 × 106b
(N=4)
300 × 106
(N=70)
450 × 106
(N=54)
Total
150 to 450 × 106
(N=128)
Overall response rate
(sCR+CR+VGPR+PR),
n (%)
94 (67.1) 2 (50.0) 48 (68.6) 44 (81.5) 94 (73.4)
95% CIc 59.4, 74.9 6.8, 93.2 56.4, 79.1 68.6, 90.7 65.8, 81.1
CR or better, n (%) 42 (30.0) 1 (25.0) 20 (28.6) 21 (38.9) 42 (32.8)
95% CIc 22.4, 37.6 0.6, 80.6 18.4, 40.6 25.9, 53.1 24.7, 40.9
VGPR or better, n (%) 68 (48.6) 2 (50.0) 31 (44.3) 35 (64.8) 68 (53.1)
95% CIc 40.3, 56.9 6.8, 93.2 32.4, 56.7 50.6, 77.3 44.5, 61.8
MRD-negative statusd and ≥ CR     
Based on treated patients 4 70 54 128
n (%) 1 (25.0) 17 (24.3) 14 (25.9) 32 (25.0)
95% CI0.6, 80.6 14.8, 36.0 15.0, 39.7 17.8, 33.4
Time to response, n 94 2 48 44 94
Median (months) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Min, max 0.5, 8.8 1.0, 1.0 0.5, 8.8 0.9, 2.0 0.5, 8.8
Duration of response
(PR or better)e, n
94 2 48 44 94
Median (months) 10.6 15.8 8.5 11.3 10.6
95% CI 8.0, 11.4 2.8, 28.8 5.4, 11.0 10.3, 17.0 8.0, 11.4

NE = not estimable; PR = partial response; sCR = stringent complete response; VGPR = very good partial response.
a All patients who underwent leukapheresis.
b The 150 × 106 CAR-positive T cell dose is not part of the approved dose range.
c For “Total (Treated population” and “Enrolled population”): Wald CI; for individual target dose levels: Clopper-Pearson exact CI.
d Based on a threshold of 10-5 using a next-generation sequencing assay. 95% CI for percentage of MRD negativity use Clopper-Pearson exact CI for individual target dose levels as well as for Treated population.
e Median and 95% CI are based on the Kaplan-Meier approach.
Note: The target dose is 450 × 106 CAR-positive T cells within a range of 150 to 540 × 106 CAR-positive T cells. The 150 × 106 CAR-positive T cell dose is not part of the approved dose range.

The Kaplan-Meier curve of duration of response by best overall response is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier curve of duration of response based on independent response committee review according to IMWG criteria – by best overall response (Abecma-treated population):

Special populations

Elderly

In the clinical trial of Abecma, 48 (34.3%) patients in the KarMMa study were 65 years of age or older and 5 (3.6%) were 75 years of age or older (see Table 5). No clinically important differences in the safety or effectiveness of Abecma were observed between these patients and patients younger than 65 years of age.

Paediatric population

The European Medicines Agency has waived the obligation to submit the results of studies with Abecma in all subsets of the paediatric population in the treatment of mature B-cell neoplasms (see section 4.2 for information on paediatric use).

This medicinal product has been authorised under a so-called ‘conditional approval scheme’. This means that further evidence on this medicinal product is awaited. The European Medicines Agency will review new information on this medicinal product at least every year and this SmPC will be updated as necessary.

5.2. Pharmacokinetic properties

Following Abecma infusion, the CAR-positive T cells proliferate and undergo rapid multi-log expansion followed by a bi-exponential decline. The median time of maximal expansion in peripheral blood (Tmax) occurred 11 days after infusion.

Abecma can persist in peripheral blood for up to 1 year post-infusion.

Abecma transgene levels were positively associated with objective tumour response (partial response or better). The median Cmax levels in responders (N=93) were approximately 4.5-fold higher compared to the corresponding levels in non-responders (N=34). Median AUC0-28days in responding patients (N=93) was approximately 5.5-fold higher than non-responders (N=32).

Special populations

Renal and hepatic impairment

Hepatic and renal impairment studies of Abecma were not conducted.

Effects of age, weight, gender or race

Age (range: 33 to 78 years) had no impact on Abecma expansion parameters. The pharmacokinetics of Abecma in patients less than 18 years of age have not been evaluated.

Patients with lower body weight had higher cellular expansion. Due to high variability in pharmacokinetic cellular expansion, the overall effect of weight on the expanison parameters of Abecma is considered not to be clinically relevant.

Gender had no impact on Abecma expansion parameters.

Race and ethnicity had no significant impact on Abecma expansion parameters.

5.3. Preclinical safety data

Abecma comprises engineered human T cells, therefore there are no representative in vitro assays, ex vivo models, or in vivo models that can accurately address the toxicological characteristics of the human product. Hence, traditional toxicology studies used for drug development were not performed. Genotoxicity assays and carcinogenicity studies were not conducted.

In vitro expansion studies from healthy donors and patients showed no evidence for transformation and/or immortalisation and no preferential integration near genes of concern in Abecma T cells.

Given the nature of the product, non-clinical studies on fertility, reproduction and development were not conducted.

© All content on this website, including data entry, data processing, decision support tools, "RxReasoner" logo and graphics, is the intellectual property of RxReasoner and is protected by copyright laws. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of any part of this content without explicit written permission from RxReasoner is strictly prohibited. Any third-party content used on this site is acknowledged and utilized under fair use principles.