Source: European Medicines Agency (EU) Revision Year: 2026 Publisher: Incyte Biosciences Distribution B.V., Paasheuvelweg 25, 1105 BP Amsterdam, Netherlands
Pharmacotherapeutic group: antineoplastic agents, protein kinase inhibitors
ATC code: L01EA05
Ponatinib is a potent pan BCR-ABL inhibitor with structural elements, including a carbon-carbon triple-bond, that enable high affinity binding to native BCR-ABL and mutant forms of the ABL kinase.
Ponatinib inhibits the tyrosine kinase activity of ABL and T315I mutant ABL with IC50 values of 0.4 and 2.0 nM, respectively. In cellular assays, ponatinib was able to overcome imatinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib resistance mediated by BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations. In preclinical mutagenesis studies, 40 nM was determined as the concentration of ponatinib sufficient to inhibit viability of cells expressing all tested BCR-ABL mutants by >50% (including T315I) and suppress the emergence of mutant clones. In a cell-based accelerated mutagenesis assay, no mutation in BCR-ABL was detected that could confer resistance to 40 nM ponatinib.
Ponatinib elicited tumour shrinkage and prolonged survival in mice bearing tumours expressing native or T315I mutant BCR-ABL.
At doses of 30 mg or greater plasma steady state trough concentrations of ponatinib typically exceed 21 ng/mL (40 nM). At doses of 15 mg or greater, 32 of 34 patients (94%) demonstrated a ≥50% reduction of CRK-like (CRKL) phosphorylation, a biomarker of BCR-ABL inhibition, in peripheral blood mononuclear cells.
Ponatinib inhibits the activity of other clinically relevant kinases with IC50 values below 20 nM and has demonstrated cellular activity against RET, FLT3, and KIT and members of the FGFR, PDGFR, and VEGFR families of kinases.
The QT interval prolongation potential of Iclusig was assessed in 39 patients with leukaemia who received 30 mg, 45 mg, or 60 mg Iclusig once daily. Serial ECGs in triplicate were collected at baseline and at steady state to evaluate the effect of ponatinib on QT intervals. No clinically significant changes in the mean QTc interval (i.e., >20 ms) from baseline were detected in the study. In addition, the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models show no exposure-effect relationship, with an estimated QTcF mean change of –6.4 ms (upper confidence interval –0.9 ms) at Cmax for the 60 mg group.
The safety and efficacy of Iclusig in CML and Ph+ ALL patients who were resistant or intolerant to prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy were evaluated in a single-arm, open-label, international, multicenter trial. All patients were administered 45 mg of Iclusig once-daily with the possibility of dose de-escalations and dose interruptions followed by dose resumption and re-escalation. Patients were assigned to one of six cohorts based on disease phase (CP-CML; AP-CML; or BPCML/Ph+ ALL), resistance or intolerance (R/I) to dasatinib or nilotinib, and the presence of the T315I mutation. The trial is ongoing.
Resistance in CP-CML was defined as failure to achieve either a complete haematological response (by 3 months), a minor cytogenetic response (by 6 months), or a major cytogenetic response (by 12 months) while on dasatinib or nilotinib. CP-CML patients who experienced a loss of response or development of a kinase domain mutation in the absence of a complete cytogenetic response or progression to AP-CML or BP-CML at any time on dasatinib or nilotinib were also considered resistant. Resistance in AP-CML and BP-CML/Ph+ ALL was defined as failure to achieve either a major haematological response (AP-CML by 3 months, BP-CML/Ph+ ALL by 1 month), loss of major haematological response (at any time), or development of kinase domain mutation in the absence of a major haematological response while on dasatinib or nilotinib.
Intolerance was defined as the discontinuation of dasatinib or nilotinib due to toxicities despite optimal management in the absence of a complete cytogenetic response for CP CML patients or major haematological response for AP CML, BP CML, or Ph+ ALL patients.
The primary efficacy endpoint in CP-CML was major cytogenetic response (MCyR), which included complete and partial cytogenetic responses (CCyR and PCyR) by 12 months. The secondary efficacy endpoints in CP-CML were complete haematological response (CHR) and major molecular response (MMR).
The primary efficacy endpoint in AP-CML and BP-CML/Ph+ ALL was major haematological response (MaHR), defined as either a complete haematological response (CHR) or no evidence of leukaemia (NEL). The secondary efficacy endpoints in AP-CML and BP-CML/Ph+ ALL were MCyR and MMR.
For all patients, additional secondary efficacy endpoints included: confirmed MCyR, time to response, duration of response, progression free survival, and overall survival. Also, post-hoc analyses to assess the relationship of shorter-term cytogenetic (MCyR) and molecular (MMR) response outcomes with longer-term outcomes of PFS and OS, maintenance of response (MCyR and MMR) after dose reductions, and PFS and OS by Arterial Occlusive Event status were conducted.
The trial enrolled 449 patients of which 444 were eligible for analysis: 267 CP-CML patients (R/I Cohort: n=203, T315I Cohort: n=64), 83 AP-CML patients (R/I Cohort: n=65, T315I Cohort: n=18), 62 BP-CML (R/I Cohort: n=38, T315I Cohort: n=24), and 32 Ph+ ALL patients (R/I Cohort: n=10, T315I Cohort: n=22). A prior MCyR or better (MCyR, MMR, or CMR) to dasatinib or nilotinib was only achieved in 26% patients with CP-CML and a prior MaHR or better (MaHR, MCyR, MMR, or CMR) was only achieved in 21%, and 24% of AP-CML, and BP-CML/Ph+ALL patients, respectively. Baseline demographic characteristics are described in Table 12 below.
Table 12. Demographics and disease characteristics for the PACE trial:
| Patient characteristics at entry | Total safety population N=449 |
| Age | |
| Median, years (range) | 59 (18 - 94) |
| Gender, n (%) | |
| Male | 238 (53%) |
| Race, n (%) | |
| Asian | 59 (13%) |
| Black/African American | 25 (6%) |
| White | 352 (78%) |
| Other | 13 (3%) |
| ECOG Performance Status, n (%) | |
| ECOG = 0 or 1 | 414 (92%) |
| Disease history | |
| Median time from diagnosis to first dose, years (range) | 6.09 (0.33 - 28.47) |
| Resistant to Prior TKI Therapya*, n (%) | 374 (88%) |
| Prior TKI therapy – number of regimens, n (%) | |
| 1 | 32 (7%) |
| 2 | 155 (35%) |
| ≥3 | 262 (58%) |
| BCR-ABL mutation detected at entry, n (%)b | |
| None | 198 (44%) |
| 1 | 192 (43%) |
| ≥2 | 54 (12%) |
| Comorbidities | |
| Hypertension | 159 (35%) |
| Diabetes | 57 (13%) |
| Hypercholesterolemia | 100 (22%) |
| History of ischemic heart disease | 67 (15%) |
a* of 427 patients reporting prior TKI therapy with dasatinib or nilotinib
b Of the patients with one or more BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations detected at entry, 37 unique mutations were detected.
Overall, 55% of patients had one or more BCR-ABL kinase domain mutation at entry with the most frequent being: T315I (29%), F317L (8%), E255K (4%) and F359V (4%). In 67% of CP-CML patients in the R/I cohort, no mutations were detected at study entry.
Efficacy results are summarized in Table 13, Table 14, and Table 15.
Table 13. Efficacy of Iclusig in resistant or intolerant chronic phase CML patients:
| Overall (N=267) | Resistant or Intolerant | ||
| R/I Cohort (N=203) | T315I Cohort (N=64) | ||
| Cytogenetic Response | |||
| Major (MCyR)a % (95% CI) | 55% (49-62) | 51% (44-58) | 70% (58-81) |
| Complete (CCyR) % (95% CI) | 46% (40-52) | 40% (33-47) | 66% (53-77) |
| Major Molecular Responseb % (95% CI) | 40% (35-47) | 35% (28-42) | 58% (45-70) |
a Primary endpoint for CP-CML Cohorts was MCyR, which combines both complete (No detectable Ph+ cells) and partial (1% to 35% Ph+ cells) cytogenetic responses.
b Measured in peripheral blood. Defined as a ≤0.1% ratio of BCR-ABL to ABL transcripts on the International Scale (IS) (ie, ≤0.1% BCR-ABLIS; patients must have the b2a2/b3a2 (p210) transcript), in peripheral blood measured by quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT PCR).
Database cutoff date 06 February 2017.
CP-CML patients who received fewer prior TKIs attained higher cytogenetic, haematological, and molecular responses. Of the CP-CML patients previously treated with one, two, three or four prior TKIs, 75% (12/16), 68% (66/97), 44% (63/142), and 58% (7/12)) achieved a MCyR while on Iclusig, respectively. The median dose intensity was 28 mg/day or, 63% of the expected 45 mg dose.
Of the CP-CML patients with no mutation detected at entry, 49% (66/136) achieved a MCyR.
For every BCR-ABL mutation detected in more than one CP-CML patient at entry, a MCyR was achieved following treatment with Iclusig.
In CP-CML patients who achieved MCyR, the median time to MCyR was 2.8 months (range: 1.6 to 11.3 months) and in patients who achieved MMR, the median time to MMR was 5.5 months (range: 1.8 to 55.5 months). At the time of updated reporting with minimum follow-up for all ongoing patients of 64 months, the median durations of MCyR and MMR had not yet been reached. Based on the Kaplan-Meier estimates, 82% (95% CI: [74%–88%]) of CP-CML (median duration of treatment: 32.2 months) patients who achieved a MCyR are projected to maintain that response at 48 months and 61% (95% CI: [51%-70%]) of CP-CML patients who achieved a MMR are projected to maintain that response at 36 months. The probability of all patients with CP-CML maintaining MCyR and MMR did not change further when the analysis was extended out to 5 years.
With a minimum follow-up of 64 months, 3.4% (9/267) of CP-CML patients experienced transformation of their disease to AP-CML or BP-CML.
For CP-CML patients overall (N=267), as well as for CP-CML R/I Cohort A patients (N=203) and T315I Cohort B patients (N=64), the median OS has not yet been reached. For the overall CP-CML disease group, the probability of survival at 2, 3, 4, and 5 years is estimated as 86.0%, 81.2%, 76.9%, and 73.3%, respectively, as shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier estimates for overall survival in the CP-CML population (Treated Population):
CP-CML patients who achieved MCyR or MMR response within the first year of treatment had statistically significantly improved progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to those patients who did not meet the treatment milestones. A MCyR at the 3-month landmark correlated strongly and statistically significantly with PFS and OS (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0006, respectively). Statistical significance was achieved in the correlation of PFS and OS with a MCyR at the 12-month landmark (p = <0.0001 and p = 0.0012, respectively).
Table 14. Efficacy of Iclusig in resistant or intolerant advanced phase CML patients:
| Accelerated Phase CML | Blast Phase CML | |||||
| Overall (N=83) | Resistant or Intolerant | Overall (N=62) | Resistant or Intolerant | |||
| R/I Cohort (N=65) | T315I Cohort (N=18) | R/I Cohort (N=38) | T315I Cohort (N=24) | |||
| Haematological Response Rate | ||||||
| Majora (MaHR) % (95% CI) | 57% (45-68) | 57% (44-69) | 56% (31-79) | 31% (20–44) | 32% (18–49) | 29% (13–51) |
| Completeb (CHR) % (95% CI) | 51% (39-62) | 49% (37-62) | 56% (31-79) | 21% (12-33) | 24% (11-40) | 17% (5-37) |
| Major Cytogenetic Responsec % (95% CI) | 39% (28-50) | 34% (23-47) | 56% (31-79) | 23% (13-35) | 18% (8-34) | 29% (13-51) |
a Primary endpoint for AP-CML and BP-CML/Ph+ ALL Cohorts was MaHR, which combines complete haematological responses and no evidence of leukaemia.
b CHR: WBC ≤ institutional ULN, ANC ≥ 1 000/mm³, platelets ≥ 100 000/mm³, no blasts or promyelocytes in peripheral blood, bone marrow blasts ≤ 5%, < 5% myelocytes plus metamyelocytes in peripheral blood, basophils < 5% in peripheral blood, No extramedullary involvement (including no hepatomegaly or splenomegaly).
c MCyR combines both complete (No detectable Ph+ cells) and partial (1% to 35% Ph+ cells) cytogenetic responses.
Database cutoff date 06 February 2017
The median dose intensity was 32 mg/day in the AP-CML patients.
Table 15. Efficacy of Iclusig in resistant or intolerant Ph+ ALL patients:
| Overall (N=32) | Resistant or Intolerant | ||
| R/I Cohort (N=10) | T315I Cohort (N=22) | ||
| Haematological Response Rate | |||
| Majora (MaHR) % (95% CI) | 41% (24-59) | 50% (19-81) | 36% (17-59) |
| Completeb (CHR) % (95% CI) | 34% (19-53) | 40% (12-74) | 32% (14-55) |
| Major Cytogenetic Responsec % (95% CI) | 47% (29-65) | 60% (26-88) | 41% (21-64) |
a Primary endpoint for AP-CML and BP-CML/Ph+ ALL Cohorts was MaHR, which combines complete haematological responses and no evidence of leukaemia.
b CHR: WBC ≤ institutional ULN, ANC ≥ 1 000/mm³, platelets ≥ 100 000/mm³, no blasts or promyelocytes in peripheral blood, bone marrow blasts ≤ 5%, < 5% myelocytes plus metamyelocytes in peripheral blood, basophils < 5% in peripheral blood, No extramedullary involvement (including no hepatomegaly or splenomegaly).
c MCyR combines both complete (No detectable Ph+ cells) and partial (1% to 35% Ph+ cells) cytogenetic responses.
Database cutoff date 06 February 2017
The median dose intensity was 44 mg/day in the BP CML/Ph+ ALL patients.
The median time to MaHR in patients with AP-CML, BP-CML, and Ph+ ALL was 0.7 months (range: 0.4 to 5.8 months), 1.0 months (range: 0.4 to 3.7 months), and 0.7 months (range: 0.4 to 5.5 months), respectively. At the time of updated reporting with minimum follow-up for all ongoing patients of 64 months, the median duration of MaHR for AP-CML (median duration of treatment: 19.4 months) BP-CML (median duration of treatment: 2.9 months), and Ph+ ALL (median duration of treatment: 2.7 months) patients was estimated as 12.9 months (range: 1.2 to 68.4 months), 6.0 months (range: 1.8 to 59.6 months), and 3.2 months (range: 1.8 to 12.8 months), respectively.
For all patients in the PACE phase 2 trial, the dose intensity-safety relationship indicated that there are significant increases in grade ≥ 3 adverse events (cardiac failure, arterial thrombosis, hypertension, thrombocytopenia, pancreatitis, neutropenia, rash, ALT increase, AST increase, lipase increase, myelosuppression, arthralgia) over the dose range of 15 to 45 mg once-daily.
The analysis of the dose intensity-safety relationship in the PACE phase 2 trial concluded that after adjusting for covariates, the overall dose intensity is significantly associated with an increased risk of arterial occlusion, with an odds ratio of approximately 1.6 for each 15 mg increase. In addition, results from logistic regression analyses of data from patients in the phase 1 trial, suggest a relationship between systemic exposure (AUC) and occurrence of arterial thrombotic events. A reduction in dose is therefore expected to reduce the risk of vascular occlusive events, however, the analysis suggested that there may be a 'carry over' effect of higher doses such that it might take up to several months before a dose reduction manifests in risk reduction. Other covariates that show a statistically significant association with the occurrence of vascular occlusive events in this analysis are medical history of ischemia and age.
In the PACE phase 2 trial, dose reductions were recommended following adverse events. Additional recommendations for prospective dose reduction in all CP-CML patients in the absence of adverse events were introduced in this trial with the aim of reducing the risk of vascular occlusive events. With a minimum follow-up of 48 months, and approximately 2 years after the recommendation for prospective dose reduction, there were 110 CP-CML patients ongoing. A majority of these ongoing patients (82/110 patients; 75%) were reported to be receiving 15 mg at the last dose, while 24/110 patients (22%) were receiving 30 mg, and 4/110 (4%) were receiving 45 mg. At the time of study closure initiation (minimum follow-up of 64 months, and more than 3 years after the recommendation for prospective dose reduction), 99 CP-CML patients were ongoing and 77 (78%) of these patients received 15 mg as their last dose on study.
In the phase 2 trial, 86 CP-CML patients achieved MCyR at a dose of 45 mg, 45 CP-CML patients achieved MCyR after a dose reduction to 30 mg, mostly for adverse events. Vascular occlusive events occurred in 44 of these 131 patients. Most of these events occurred at the dose at which the patient achieved MCyR; fewer events occurred after dose reduction.
Table 16. Vascular occlusive first adverse events in CP-CML patients who achieved MCyR at 45 mg or 30 mg (data extraction 7 April 2014):
| Most recent dose at onset of first vascular occlusive event | |||
| 45 mg | 30 mg | 15 mg | |
| Achieved MCyR at 45 mg (N=86) | 19 | 6 | 0 |
| Achieved MCyR at 30 mg (N=45) | 1 | 13 | 5 |
The median time to onset of the first cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and peripheral vascular arterial occlusive events was 351, 611, and 605 days, respectively. When adjusted for exposure, the incidence of first arterial occlusive events was greatest in the first two years of follow-up and declined with decreasing daily dose intensity (following recommendation for prospective dose reduction). Factors other than dose may also contribute to this risk of arterial occlusion.
Data from the PACE phase 2 trial are available for the maintenance of response (MCyR and MMR) in all CP-CML patients who underwent dose reduction for any reason. Table 17 shows these data for patients who achieved MCyR and MMR at 45 mg; similar data are available for patients who achieved MCyR and MMR at 30 mg.
The majority of patients who underwent a dose reduction maintained response (MCyR and MMR) for the duration of currently available follow-up. A proportion of patients did not undergo any dose reduction, based on an individual benefit-risk assessment.
Table 17. Maintenance of response in CP-CML patients who achieved MCyR or MMR at 45 mg dose (data extraction 6 February 2017):
| Achieved MCyR at 45 mg (N=86) | Achieved MMR at 45 mg (N=63) | |||
| Number of patients | Maintained MCyR | Number of patients | Maintained MMR | |
| No dose reduction | 19 | 13 (68%) | 18 | 11 (61%) |
| Dose reduction to 30 mg only | 15 | 13 (87%) | 5 | 3 (60%) |
| ≥3 month reduction at 30 mg | 12 | 10 (83%) | 3 | 2 (67%) |
| ≥6 month reduction at 30 mg | 11 | 9 (82%) | 3 | 2 (67%) |
| ≥12 month reduction at 30 mg | 8 | 7 (88%) | 3 | 2 (67%) |
| ≥18 month reduction at 30 mg | 7 | 6 (86%) | 2 | 2 (100%) |
| ≥24 month reduction at 30 mg | 6 | 6 (100%) | 2 | 2 (100%) |
| ≥36 month reduction at 30 mg | 1 | 1 (100%) | -- | -- |
| Any dose reduction to 15 mg | 52 | 51 (98%) | 40 | 36 (90%) |
| ≥3 month reduction at 15 mg | 49 | 49 (100%) | 39 | 36 (92%) |
| ≥6 month reduction at 15 mg | 47 | 47 (100%) | 37 | 35 (95%) |
| ≥12 month reduction at 15 mg | 44 | 44 (100%) | 34 | 33 (97%) |
| ≥18 month day reduction at 15 mg | 38 | 38 (100%) | 29 | 29 (100%) |
| ≥24 month reduction at 15 mg | 32 | 32 (100%) | 23 | 23 (100%) |
| ≥36 month reduction at 15 mg | 8 | 8 (100%) | 4 | 4 (100%) |
The anti-leukaemic activity of Iclusig was also evaluated in a phase 1 dose escalation study that included 65 CML and Ph+ ALL patients; the study is completed. Of 43 CP-CML patients, 31 CP-CML patients achieved a MCyR with a median duration of follow-up of 55.5 months (range: 1.7 to 91.4 months). At the time of reporting, 25 CP-CML patients were in MCyR (median duration of MCyR had not been reached).
The safety and efficacy of Iclusig was evaluated in the OPTIC phase 2 trial, a dose-optimization trial. Eligible patients had CP-CML whose disease was considered to be resistant to at least 2 prior kinase inhibitors or who have the T315I mutation. Resistance in CP-CML while on a prior kinase inhibitor was defined as failure to achieve either a complete hematologic response (by 3 months), a minor cytogenetic response (by 6 months), or a major cytogenetic response (by 12 months), or development of a new BCR-ABL1 kinase domain mutation or new clonal evolution. Patients were required to have > 1% BCR-ABL1IS (by real-time polymerase chain reaction) at trial entry. Patients received one of three starting dosages: 45 mg orally once daily, 30 mg orally once daily, or 15 mg orally once daily.
Patients who received a starting dose of 45 mg or 30 mg had a mandatory dose reduction to 15 mg once daily upon achieving ≤ 1% BCR-ABL1IS. The primary efficacy endpoint was a molecular response based on the achievement of ≤ 1% BCR-ABL1IS at 12 months. All patients reached the 12-month time point (primary endpoint) by the primary analysis data cut-off. The median duration of follow-up for the 45 mg cohort (N=94) was 77.9 months (95% CI: 72.4, 84.0). Only the efficacy results for the recommended starting dose of 45 mg are described below. A total of 282 patients received Iclusig: 94 received a starting dose of 45 mg, 94 received a starting dose of 30 mg, and 94 received a starting dose of 15 mg. Baseline demographic characteristics are described in Table 18 for patients who received a starting dose of 45 mg.
Table 18. Demographic and disease characteristics for the OPTIC trial:
| Patient characteristics at entry | Iclusig 45 mg → 15 mg (N=94) |
| Age | |
| Median years (range) | 46 (19 to 81) |
| Sex, n (%) | |
| Male | 50 (53%) |
| Race, n (%) | |
| White | 73 (78%) |
| Asian | 16 (17%) |
| Other/Unknown | 4 (4%) |
| Black or African American | 1 (1%) |
| ECOG Performance Status, n (%) | |
| ECOG 0 or 1 | 93 (99%) |
| Disease History | |
| Median time from diagnosis to first dose, years (range) | 5.5 (1 to 21) |
| Resistant to Prior Kinase Inhibitor, n (%) | 92 (98%) |
| Presence of one or more BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations, n (%) | 41 (44%) |
| Number of Prior Kinase Inhibitors, n (%) | |
| 1 | 1 (1%) |
| 2 | 43 (46%) |
| ≥3 | 50 (53%) |
| T315I mutation at baseline | 25 (27%) |
| Comorbidities | |
| Hypertension | 29 (31%) |
| Diabetes | 5 (5%) |
| Hypercholesterolemia | 3 (3%) |
| History of ischemic heart disease | 3 (3%) |
Efficacy results are summarised in Table 19.
The primary endpoint was met in patients who received a starting dose of 45 mg.
Overall, 44% of patients had one or more BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations at study entry with the most frequent being T315I (27%). The subgroup analysis based on baseline T315I mutation status showed similar ≤ 1% BCR-ABL1IS rates at 2 months in patients with and without T315I (see Table 19 below). No mutations were detected at study entry for 54% of the patients who received the starting dose of 45 mg.
With a median follow up of 6.5 years among patients with CP-CML, the proportion of patients experiencing transformation of their disease to either AP-CML or BP-CML was 11.7% and 3.2% respectively.
Table 19. Efficacy results in patients with CP-CML who received Iclusig at starting dose of 45 mg in the OPTIC phase 2 trial:
| Iclusig 45 mg → 15 mg (N=93)a | |
| Molecular Response at 12 monthsb | |
| Overall ≤ 1% BCR-ABL1IS Rate % (n/N) (98.3% CI)c | 44% (41/93) (32%, 57%) |
| Patients with T315I mutation % (n/N) (95% CI) | 44% (11/25) (24%, 65%) |
| Patients without T315I mutation % (n/N) (95% CI) | 44% (29/66)d (32%, 57%) |
| Cytogenetic Response at 12 months | |
| Major (MCyR)e % (n/N) (95% CI) | 48% (44/91)f (38%, 59%) |
| Patients with T315I mutation % (n/N) (95% CI) | 52% (13/25) (31%, 72%) |
| Patients without T315I mutation % (n/N) (95% CI) | 46% (30/65)g (34%, 59%) |
a ITT population (N=93) defined as patients who had b2a2/b3a2 BCR ABL1 transcripts.
b Primary endpoint was ≤1% BCR-ABL1IS rate at 12 months. Defined as a ≤1% ratio of BCR ABL to ABL transcripts on the International Scale (IS) (i.e., ≤1% BCR-ABLIS; patients must have the b2a2/b3a2 (p210) transcript), in peripheral blood measured by quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT PCR).
c 98.3% CI is calculated using the binomial exact (Clopper-Pearson) method.
d Of the 93 patients, two patients did not have a baseline mutation assessment and were excluded from the response by mutation analysis.
e Secondary endpoint was MCyR by 12 months which combines both complete (no detectable Ph+ cells) and partial (1% to 35% Ph+ cells in at least 20 metaphases) cytogenetic responses.
f Analysis is based on ITT cytogenetic population (N=91) defined as patients who had a cytogenetic assessment at baseline with at least 20 metaphases examined. One patient who had a complete cytogenetic response at baseline was excluded from the analysis.
g Of the 91 patients, one patient did not have a baseline mutation assessment and was excluded from the response by mutation analysis.
The secondary efficacy endpoints included complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) at 12 months, major molecular response (MMR) at 12 and 24 months, complete hematologic response at 3 months, time to response, duration of response, maintenance of response, progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Additional assessment included the rates of molecular response at each patient visit at 3-month intervals for 36 months based on the achievement of ≤1% BCR-ABL1IS.
The efficacy of Iclusig in combination with reduced-intensity chemotherapy followed by continued treatment with Iclusig as a single agent was evaluated in PhALLCON, a randomized, active controlled, multicenter, open label trial.
Eligible patients had newly diagnosed Ph+ALL. Randomization was stratified by age at the time of induction therapy (18 to <45 years; ≥45 to <60 years; and ≥60 years). Patients were randomized (2:1) to receive either Iclusig 30 mg orally once daily or imatinib 600 mg orally once daily in combination with 20 cycles of the chemotherapy regimen, followed by Iclusig or imatinib as monotherapy. The Iclusig dose was reduced to 15 mg once daily after completion of the induction phase and achievement of MRD negative CR. If a patient lost MRD negativity at any time after a response-based dose reduction to 15 mg, re-escalation to 30 mg once daily was allowed. Only patients who achieved CR or incomplete complete remission (CRi) with MRD negativity at the end of induction could continue study treatment at the investigator's discretion.
Study Phases and Regimens:
Following 20 cycles of Iclusig or imatinib in combination with the chemotherapy, patients continued to receive Iclusig (21%) or imatinib (9%) as single-agent therapy until relapse from complete remission (CR), progressive disease (PD), proceeded to HSCT, proceeded to alternative therapy, or unacceptable toxicity. Baseline demographic characteristics of the randomized population are described in Table 20.
Table 20. Demographic and disease characteristics for PhALLCON:
| Patient characteristics at entry | Iclusig 30 mg → 15 mg with chemotherapy (N=164) | Imatinib 600 mg with chemotherapy (N=81) |
| Age (years) | ||
| Median, years (range) | 54 (19 to 82) | 52 (19 to 75) |
| Age Category(a), n (%) | ||
| 18 to <45 years | 58 (35%) | 29 (36%) |
| 45 to <60 years | 45 (27%) | 22 (27%) |
| ≥60 years | 61 (37%) | 30 (37%) |
| Sex, n (%) | ||
| Female | 90 (55%) | 43 (53%) |
| Race, n (%) | ||
| White | 104 (63%) | 62 (77%) |
| Not reported | 28 (17%) | 2 (3%) |
| Asian | 20 (12%) | 11 (14%) |
| Black or African American | 9 (5%) | 4 (5%) |
| ECOG Performance Status, n (%) | ||
| 0 | 72 (44%) | 33 (41%) |
| 1 | 85 (52%) | 43 (53%) |
| 2 | 7 (4%) | 5 (6%) |
| Disease History | ||
| Presence of BCR-ABL1 dominant variants of p190 or p210, n (%) | 154 (94%) | 78 (96%) |
| Without extramedullary disease, n (%) | 154 (94%) | 78 (96%) |
| Median, white blood cell countb (range) | 4.37 (0.4 to 197) | 3.21 (0.2 to 81) |
| Median, bone marrow leukemic blasts (%) | 80% | 75% |
| Comorbidities, n (%) | ||
| Hypertension | 58 (35%) | 30 (37%) |
| Diabetes | 39 (24%) | 24 (30%) |
| Dyslipidemia | 29 (18%) | 23 (28%) |
a Randomization was stratified by age (18 through <45 years; ≥45 through <60 years; and ≥60 years)
b White blood cell count based on 10^9/L
The major efficacy outcome measure was MRD negative CR at the end of induction. MRD negativity was defined as ≤0.01% BCR-ABL1 as determined by central laboratory tests. CR status was defined as having <5% blasts in the bone marrow and no extramedullary disease with hematologic recovery for at least 4 weeks as assessed by the investigator.
The patient population for analysis of MRD negative CR and molecular response included 232 randomized patients who had a baseline BCR-ABL1 dominant variant of p190 or p210 as determined by central laboratory tests (154 patients in the Iclusig arm and 78 in the imatinib arm).
The key secondary efficacy outcome measure of event-free survival (EFS) was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of any of the following events: failure to achieve CR by the end of induction, relapse from CR, or death due to any cause. The patient population for EFS was based on 245 randomized patients in the ITT population with 164 randomized patients in the Iclusig arm (including 1 patient who died due to COVID before receiving the first dose) and 81 randomized patients in the imatinib arm, unless otherwise specified.
The overall rate of HSCT was 34% (56/164) in the Iclusig arm versus 48% (39/81) in the imatinib arm.
The median duration of follow-up for overall survival was 20.43 months (95% CI: 18.39, 23.93) in the Iclusig arm and 18.14 months (95% CI: 13.86, 24.25) in the imatinib arm.
The study demonstrated a statistically significant higher MRD negative CR rate at the end of induction for patients randomized to the Iclusig arm compared to the imatinib arm.
At the data cutoff point, the results for the key secondary efficacy outcome measure of EFS were not mature, with 33.5% of the required events for final analysis (34/164 events in the Iclusig arm and 24/81 events in the imatinib arm).
Efficacy results are summarized in Table 21.
Table 21. Efficacy results in patients with Ph+ ALL in PhALLCONa:
| Iclusig 30 mg → 15 mg with chemotherapy (N=154) | Imatinib 600 mg with chemotherapy (N=78) | |
| MRD-negative CRb at End of Induction | ||
| Achieved at the end of induction % (n/N) | 34.4% (53/154) | 16.7% (13/78) |
| Risk difference (95% CI)c | 0.18 (0.06, 0.29) | |
| p-valued | 0.0021 | |
| Relative risk (95% CI)e | 2.06 (1.19, 3.56) | |
MRD: minimal residual disease; CR: complete response; MR: molecular response; BCR-ABL1: breakpoint cluster region-Abelson.
a Based on 232 randomized patients who had a BCR-ABL1 dominant variant of p190 or p210 as determined by central laboratory tests at baseline.
b MRD-negative CR rate is defined as the proportion of patients who achieved MRD-negative CR (≤0.01% BCR-ABL1/ABL1 or undetectable BCR-ABL1 transcripts in cDNA with ≥10,000 ABL1 transcripts, and meeting criteria for CR).
c Difference and 95% CI: adjusted risk ICLUSIG – adjusted risk imatinib, and its 95% CI.
d p-value is based on Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) chi-square test, with stratification according to randomization strata (age): 18 through <45 years, ≥45 through <60 years, and ≥60 years
e Adjusted Relative Risk and its 95% CI based on CMH method as defined in Footnote [d].
A phase ½ open-label, single-arm study (Study 102) in paediatric population has evaluated the tolerability, safety, PK/pharmacodynamics, and efficacy of oral ponatinib in 61 paediatric participants (≥1 to <18 years old) with recurrent or refractory leukemias, lymphomas, or solid tumors, with a CP-CML expansion cohort.
A total of 10 patients from 6 to <18 years of age with CP-CML who were resistant to or intolerant of at least 1 prior BCR-ABL–targeted TKI therapy or who had the kinase domain mutation T315I received ponatinib treatment.
In participants with CP-CML, the median exposure to ponatinib was 533 days (range: 72, 1 100) and the median average daily dose was 40.59 mg.
The primary efficacy endpoint for participants with CP-CML was MCyR by 12 months assessed by conventional cytogenetics or FISH. The secondary endpoints were CHR at 6 months, CCyR at 12 months, Major molecular response (MMR) at 12 months, TTR, DoR, PFS, and OS.
All participants (100%) with CP-CML had received prior BCR-ABL TKI treatment.
In those participants, Major Cytogenetic Response Rate (MCyR) by 12 months was 90.0%. The Complete hematologic response (CHR) at 6 months was 90%. the median time to CyR was 1 month and to MR 2.83 months. The clinical efficacy and safety profile of ponatinib in the paediatric CP-CML population was consistent with the profile observed in the adult CP-CML population.
A phase 1/2, single-arm, open-label, multicenter study (Study 1501) in 11 paediatric participants aged 9-17 years has evaluated the safety, tolerability, PK, and efficacy of ponatinib when administered in combination with multiagent chemotherapy, for the treatment of Ph+ ALL in children with Ph+ ALL, Ph+ MPAL, or Ph-like ALL disease that had relapsed or was resistant or intolerant to at least 1 prior BCR-ABL TKI-containing therapy, or with Ph+ ALL disease with T315I mutation.
The study in paediatric participants with R/R Ph+ ALL treated with ponatinib in combination with an intensive, 4-agent induction chemotherapy regimen (PEG-asparaginase, daunorubicin, dexamethasone, and vincristine) demonstrated that the combination of ponatinib once a day with an intensive, 4-agent chemotherapy regimen is not tolerated in those patients.
Peak concentrations of ponatinib are observed approximately 4 hours after oral administration. Within the range of clinically relevant doses evaluated in patients (15 mg to 60 mg), ponatinib exhibited dose proportional increases in both Cmax and AUC. The geometric mean (CV%) Cmax and AUC(0-τ) exposures achieved for ponatinib 45 mg daily at steady state were 77 ng/mL (50%) and 1296 ng•hr/mL (48%), respectively. Following either a high-fat and low-fat meal, plasma ponatinib exposures (Cmax and AUC) were not different versus fasting conditions. Iclusig may be administered with or without food. Co-administration of Iclusig with a potent inhibitor of gastric acid secretion resulted in a minor reduction in ponatinib Cmax without a reduction in AUC0-∞.
Ponatinib is highly bound (>99%) to plasma proteins in vitro. The blood/plasma ratio of ponatinib is 0.96. Ponatinib is not displaced by concomitant administration of ibuprofen, nifedipine, propranolol, salicylic acid, or warfarin. At daily doses of 45 mg, the geometric mean (CV%) apparent steady state volume of distribution is 1101 L (94%) suggesting that ponatinib is extensively distributed in the extravascular space. In vitro studies suggested that ponatinib is either not a substrate or is a weak substrate for both P-gp and breast cancer resistance protein BCRP. Ponatinib is not a substrate for the human organic anion transporting polypeptides OATP1B1, OATP1B3 and the organic cation transporter OCT-1.
Ponatinib is metabolized to an inactive carboxylic acid by esterases and/or amidases, and metabolized by CYP3A4 to an N-desmethyl metabolite that is 4 times less active than ponatinib. The carboxylic acid and the N-desmethyl metabolite comprise 58% and 2% of the circulating levels of ponatinib, respectively.
At therapeutic serum concentrations, ponatinib did not inhibit OATP1B1 or OATP1B3, OCT1 or OCT2, organic anion transporters OAT1 or OAT3, or bile salt export pump (BSEP) in vitro. Therefore, clinical medicinal product interactions are unlikely to occur as a result of ponatinib-mediated inhibition of substrates for these transporters. In vitro studies indicate that clinical medicinal product interactions are unlikely to occur as a result of ponatinib-mediated inhibition of the metabolism of substrates for CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP3A or CYP2D6.
An in vitro study in human hepatocytes indicated that clinical medicinal product interactions are also unlikely to occur as a result of ponatinib-mediated induction of the metabolism of substrates for CYP1A2, CYP2B6, or CYP3A.
Following single and multiple 45 mg doses of Iclusig, the terminal elimination half-life of ponatinib was 22 hours, and steady state conditions are typically achieved within 1 week of continuous dosing. With once-daily dosing, plasma exposures of ponatinib are increased by approximately 1.5-fold between first dose and steady state conditions. Although plasma ponatinib exposures increased to steady-state levels with continuous dosing, a population pharmacokinetic analysis predicts a limited increase in apparent oral clearance within the first two weeks of continuous dosing, which is not considered clinically relevant. Ponatinib is mainly eliminated via faeces. Following a single oral dose of [14C]-labeled ponatinib, approximately 87% of the radioactive dose is recovered in the faeces and approximately 5% in the urine. Unchanged ponatinib accounted for 24% and < 1% of the administered dose in faeces and urine, respectively, with the remainder of the dose comprising metabolites.
Iclusig has not been studied in patients with renal impairment. Although renal excretion is not a major route of ponatinib elimination, the potential for moderate or severe renal impairment to affect hepatic elimination has not been determined (see section 4.2).
A single dose of 30 mg ponatinib was administered to patients with mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment and to healthy volunteers with normal hepatic function. Ponatinib Cmax was comparable in patients with mild hepatic impairment and healthy volunteers with normal hepatic function. In patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment, ponatinib Cmax and AUC0-∞ were lower and ponatinib plasma elimination half-life was longer in patients with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment but not clinically significantly different than in healthy volunteers with normal hepatic function.
In vitro data showed no difference in plasma protein binding in plasma samples of healthy subjects and hepatically impaired (mild, moderate and severe) subjects. Compared to healthy volunteers with normal liver function, no major differences in ponatinib PK were observed in patients with varying degrees of hepatic impairment. A reduction of the starting dose of Iclusig in patients with hepatic impairment is not necessary (see sections 4.2 and 4.4).
Caution is recommended when administering Iclusig to patients with hepatic impairment (see sections 4.2 and 4.4).
Iclusig has not been studied at doses above 30 mg in patients with hepatic impairment (Childs-Pugh Classes A, B & C).
No specific studies have been performed to evaluate the effects of gender, age, race, and body weight on ponatinib pharmacokinetics. An integrated population pharmacokinetic analysis completed for ponatinib suggests that age may be predictive of variability for ponatinib apparent oral clearance (CL/F). Gender, race and body weight were not predictive in explaining ponatinib pharmacokinetic intersubject variability.
Following administration of ponatinib in 61 paediatric patients using a weight-based approach once daily, steady-state exposure of ponatinib were found to be comparable to adult patients treated with 45 mg once daily. The pharmacokinetic exposure of ponatinib following multiple doses appeared to be comparable between paediatric patients from 6 years to <12 years and from ≥12 years to <18 years.
Iclusig has been evaluated in safety pharmacology, repeat-dose toxicity, genotoxicity, reproductive toxicity, phototoxicity and carcinogenicity studies.
Ponatinib did not exhibit genotoxic properties when evaluated in the standard in vitro and in vivo systems.
Adverse reactions not observed in clinical studies, but seen in animals at exposure levels similar to clinical exposure levels and with possible relevance to clinical use are described below.
Depletion of lymphoid organs was observed in repeat-dose toxicity studies in rats and cynomolgus monkeys. The effects were shown to be reversible after withdrawal of the treatment.
Hyper-/hypoplastic changes of the chondrocytes in the physis were noted in repeat-dose toxicity studies in rats.
In rats, inflammatory changes accompanied by increases in neutrophils, monocytes, eosinophils, and fibrinogen levels were found in the preputial and clitoral glands following chronic dosing.
Skin changes in the form of crusts, hyperkeratosis, or erythema were observed in toxicity studies in cynomolgus monkeys. Dry flaky skin was observed in toxicity studies in rats.
In a study in rats, diffuse corneal edema with neutrophilic cell infiltration, and hyperplastic changes in the lenticular epithelium suggestive of a mild phototoxic reaction were observed in animals treated with 5 and 10 mg/kg ponatinib.
In cynomolgus monkeys, systolic heart murmurs with no macroscopic or microscopic correlates were noted in individual animals treated with 5 and 45 mg/kg in the single dose toxicity study and at 1, 2.5 and 5 mg/kg in the 4-week repeat-dose toxicity study. The clinical relevance of this finding is unknown.
In cynomolgus monkeys, thyroid gland follicular atrophy mostly accompanied by a reduction in T3 levels and a tendency toward increased TSH levels were observed in the 4-week repeat-dose toxicity study in cynomolgus monkeys.
Ponatinib-related microscopic findings in the ovaries (increased follicular atresia) and testes (minimal germ cell degeneration) in animals treated with 5 mg/kg ponatinib were noted in repeat-dose toxicity studies in cynomolgus monkeys.
Ponatinib at doses of 3, 10, and 30 mg/kg produced increases in urine output and electrolyte excretions and caused a decrease in gastric emptying in safety pharmacology studies in rats.
In rats, embryo-foetal toxicity in the form of post-implantation loss, reduced foetal body weight, and multiple soft tissue and skeletal alterations were observed at maternal toxic dosages. Multiple foetal soft tissue and skeletal alterations were also observed at maternal nontoxic dosages.
In a fertility study in male and female rats, female fertility parameters were reduced at dose levels corresponding to human clinical exposures. Evidence for pre- and post-implantation loss of embryos was reported in female rats and ponatinib may therefore impair female fertility. There were no effects on male rat fertility parameters. The clinical relevance of these findings on human fertility is unknown.
In juvenile rats, mortality related to inflammatory effects was observed in animals treated with 3 mg/kg/day, and reductions in body weight gain were observed at doses of 0.75, 1.5 and 3 mg/kg/day during the pre-weaning and early post-weaning treatment phases. Ponatinib did not adversely affect important developmental parameters in the juvenile toxicity study.
In a two-year carcinogenicity study in male and female rats, oral administration of ponatinib at 0.05, 0.1 and 0.2 mg/kg/day in males and at 0.2 and 0.4 mg/kg/day in females did not result in any tumorigenic effects. The 0.8 mg/kg/day dose in females resulted in a plasma exposure level generally lower or equivalent to the human exposure at the range of dose from 15 mg to 45 mg daily. A statistically significant increased incidence of squamous cell carcinoma of the clitoral gland was observed at that dose. The clinical relevance of this finding for humans is not known.
© All content on this website, including data entry, data processing, decision support tools, "RxReasoner" logo and graphics, is the intellectual property of RxReasoner and is protected by copyright laws. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of any part of this content without explicit written permission from RxReasoner is strictly prohibited. Any third-party content used on this site is acknowledged and utilized under fair use principles.