Source: European Medicines Agency (EU) Revision Year: 2026 Publisher: Amgen Europe B.V., Minervum 7061, 4817 ZK Breda, The Netherlands
Pharmacotherapeutic group: Antineoplastic agents, other monoclonal antibodies and antibody drug conjugates
ATC code: L01FX33
Tarlatamab is a bispecific delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3)-directed CD3 T-cell engager that binds to DLL3 expressed on the surface of tumour cells and CD3 expressed on the surface of T-cells. The bispecific binding of tarlatamab to T-cells and DLL3-positive tumour cells triggers T-cell activation, production of inflammatory cytokines, and release of cytotoxic proteins, which results in redirected lysis of tumour cells.
The pharmacodynamic response after a single infusion of tarlatamab was characterised by T-cell redistribution and activation, and transient cytokine elevation. Peripheral T-cell redistribution (i.e., T-cell adhesion to blood vessel endothelium and/or transmigration into tissue) occurred within 24 hours after the initial dose of tarlatamab at 1 mg on day 1. T-cell counts declined within 6 hours post infusion and returned to baseline levels in the majority of the patients prior to the next infusion on day 8.
Serum cytokines IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IFN-γ and TNF-α were transiently elevated following the initial dose of tarlatamab at 1 mg on day 1. Cytokine levels peaked within the first 2 days following the start of tarlatamab infusion and generally returned to baseline levels prior to the next infusion on day 8. In subsequent treatments, cytokine elevation occurred in fewer patients with lesser intensity compared to the initial infusion on day 1.
Anti-drug antibodies (ADA) were commonly detected. No evidence of ADA impact on pharmacokinetics, efficacy or safety was observed, however, data are still limited. Clinical efficacy and safety Study DeLLphi-304 The efficacy of IMDYLLTRA was studied in a phase 3 multicentre, randomised, open-label trial (Study DeLLphi-304). Eligible patients were required to have SCLC with disease progression following 1 platinum-based regimen. In regions where standard of care (SOC) first-line systemic treatment for patients diagnosed with extensive-stage disease included platinum-based chemotherapy in combination with PD-(L)1 inhibitor, patients were required to have failed PD-(L)1 inhibitor as part of their first-line systemic treatment or to be ineligible to receive PD-(L)1 inhibitor therapy. Additionally, patients were required to have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1, and at least one measurable lesion as defined by response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST v1.1). The trial excluded patients with symptomatic brain metastases or active immunodeficiency.
A total of 509 patients were enrolled and randomised 1:1 to receive either IMDYLLTRA or SOC chemotherapy. 254 patients were randomised to IMDYLLTRA at an initial dose of 1 mg on Cycle 1 day 1 followed by 10 mg on days 8, 15, and every 2 weeks thereafter in a 28-day cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. SOC chemotherapies included topotecan (n=185), lurbinectedin (n=47) or amrubicin (n=23). Randomisation was stratified by prior anti-PD-(L)1 exposure (yes vs no), platinum sensitivity status (chemotherapy-free interval ≥180 days, <180 to ≥90 days, or <90 days), presence (previous or current) of brain metastases (yes vs no) and standard of care (topotecan/amrubicin vs lurbinectedin). Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Tumour assessments were performed every 6 weeks for the first 48 weeks and every 12 weeks thereafter.
The baseline demographics and disease characteristics of the study population were: median age of 65 years (range: 20 to 86 years); 41.3% age 65 to 74; 10.8% age 75 or older; 69% male; 57.2% White and 40.1% Asian; 32% ECOG PS of 0 and 67.2% ECOG PS of 1; 91% patients had metastatic disease at baseline; 44.8% had brain metastases at baseline; 35.2% had liver metastases at baseline. 68.8% patients were former smokers; 20.6% were current smokers, 10.6% were never smokers. All patients received at least 1 line of prior platinum-based chemotherapy (range: 1 to 3 lines); 97.6% of patients had received 1 prior treatment line; 70.7% received prior anti-PD-(L)1 therapy; 223 patients (43.8%) had chemotherapy-free interval <90 days after end of first-line platinum therapy, while 286 patients (56.2%) had chemotherapy-free interval ≥90 days.
The primary efficacy outcome measure was overall survival (OS). Key secondary efficacy outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) based on investigator assessment per response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST v1.1) and select patient-reported outcomes. Additional endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) based on investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1.
Patients received a median of 5 cycles of IMDYLLTRA treatment (range: 1 to 19 cycles), and a median of 4 cycles of SOC treatment (range: 1 to 21 cycles).
Efficacy results are summarised in table 9 and figure 1. The median (95% CI) follow-up time for OS was 11.2 months (10.4, 12.1) in the tarlatamab group and 11.7 months (10.6, 12.3) in the SOC chemotherapy group. The median (95% CI) follow-up time for PFS was 11.0 (8.5, 11.2) months for tarlatamab and 9.7 (8.4, 11.1) months for SOC chemotherapy.
Table 9. Efficacy results for patients with SCLC in Study DeLLphi-304:
| Efficacy parameter | IMDYLLTRA (N=254) | Standard of care (N=255) |
| Overall survival (OS) | ||
| Deaths (%) | 111 (43.7) | 152 (59.6) |
| Mediana in months (95% CI) | 13.6 (11.1, NE) | 8.3 (7.0, 10.2) |
| Hazard ratiob (95% CI) | 0.60 (0.47, 0.77) | |
| p-value (stratified log-rank) | <0.001 | |
| Progression-free survival (PFS)c | ||
| Events (%) | 191 (75.2) | 205 (80.4) |
| Mediana in months (95% CI) | 4.2 (3.0, 4.4) | 3.2 (2.9, 4.2) |
| Hazard ratiob (95% CI) | 0.72 (0.59, 0.88) | |
| p-value (stratified log-rank) | <0.001 | |
| Overall response rate (ORR)c | ||
| ORR, % | 35.0 | 20.4 |
a per Kaplan-Meier estimates.
b Hazard ratio based on the stratified Cox proportional hazard model.
c PFS, ORR based on investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1.
CI = Confidence interval; N = number; NE = not estimable
The European Medicines Agency has waived the obligation to submit the results of studies with tarlatamab in all subsets of the paediatric population in treatment of small cell lung cancer (see section 4.2 for information on paediatric use).
Tarlatamab population pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses in adult subjects (n=702) with previously treated advanced SCLC were performed to characterise the time course of tarlatamab serum concentrations after intravenous administration, to quantify inter-individual variability and to evaluate effects of subject specific covariates on the PK parameters of tarlatamab.
The peak serum concentration (Cmax), trough serum concentration (Ctrough) and area under the serum concentration versus time curve at steady state (AUCtau) of tarlatamab increased dose proportionally in the evaluated dose range of 1 mg to 100 mg Q2W (10 times the recommended dose). Approximate steady state in serum tarlatamab exposures were achieved by cycle 2 day 15.
The typical value (inter-subject CV%) for central volume of distribution is 3.23 L (38%) and steady state volume of distribution is 8.19 L as estimated by population PK analysis.
The metabolic pathway of tarlatamab has not been characterised. Like other protein therapeutics, tarlatamab is expected to be degraded into small peptides and amino acids via catabolic pathways.
The systemic clearance (inter-subject CV%) was 0.728 L/day (34%) and terminal elimination half-life was approximately 10.6 days in subjects with SCLC as estimated by population PK analysis.
No clinically meaningful differences in the clearance of tarlatamab were observed based on age (range: 20-86 years), bodyweight (range: 35-149 kg), sex, race, mild or moderate renal impairment (eGFR ≥ 30 mL/min), or mild hepatic impairment (total bilirubin ≤ upper limit of normal (ULN) and AST > ULN). Limited data is available in patients with moderate hepatic impairment and no data is available in patients with severe hepatic or severe renal impairment.
Non-clinical data reveal no special hazard for humans based on conventional studies of safety pharmacology and repeated dose toxicity.
No genotoxicity or carcinogenicity studies have been conducted with tarlatamab.
No studies have been conducted to evaluate the effects of tarlatamab on fertility.
A reproductive toxicity study conducted in mice using the murine surrogate molecule muS757 showed transplacental transport of muS757 and did not induce embryo-foetal toxicity or teratogenicity.
© All content on this website, including data entry, data processing, decision support tools, "RxReasoner" logo and graphics, is the intellectual property of RxReasoner and is protected by copyright laws. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of any part of this content without explicit written permission from RxReasoner is strictly prohibited. Any third-party content used on this site is acknowledged and utilized under fair use principles.