Chemical formula: C₂₂H₂₇ClFN₇O₄S Molecular mass: 540.01 g/mol PubChem compound: 50922675
Encorafenib interacts in the following cases:
Co-administration of encorafenib with a CYP3A4 inducer was not assessed in a clinical study; however, a reduction in encorafenib exposure is likely and may result in compromised efficacy. Examples of moderate or strong CYP3A4 inducers include, but are not limited to carbamazepine, rifampicin, phenytoin and St. John’s Wort. Alternative agents with no or minimal CYP3A induction potential should be considered.
Co-administration of moderate (diltiazem) and strong (posaconazole) CYP3A4 inhibitors with single doses of encorafenib in healthy volunteers resulted in a 2 and 3-fold increase in the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), respectively and in 44.6% and 68.3% increase in maximum encorafenib concentration (Cmax) respectively.
Model based predictions indicate that the effect of posaconazole after repeated administrations could be similar for AUC (3-fold increase) and slightly greater for Cmax (2.7-fold increase). Model-based predictions for ketoconazole suggest an increase of approx. 5-fold for encorafenib AUC and 3 to 4-fold for encorafenib Cmax.
Therefore, concomitant administration of encorafenib with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors should be avoided (due to increased encorafenib exposure and potential increase in toxicity). Examples of strong CYP3A4 inhibitors include, but are not limited to, ritonavir, itraconazole, clarithromycin, telithromycin, posaconazole and grapefruit juice. If concomitant use of a strong CYP3A inhibitor is unavoidable, patients should be carefully monitored for safety.
Moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors should be co-administered with caution. Examples of moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors include, but are not limited to, amiodarone, erythromycin, fluconazole, diltiazem, amprenavir and imatinib. When encorafenib is co-administered with a moderate CYP3A inhibitor, patients should be carefully monitored for safety.
Encorafenib is both an inhibitor and inducer of CYP3A4. Concomitant use with agents that are substrates of CYP3A4 (e.g. hormonal contraceptives) may result in increased toxicity or loss of efficacy of these agents. Agents that are CYP3A4 substrates should be co-administered with caution.
Encorafenib potentially inhibits a number of transporters. Agents that are substrates of P-gp (e.g. posaconazole) may have increased exposure and should be therefore co-administered with caution.
There are no data available in patients with severe renal impairment. Encorafenib should be used with caution in patients with severe renal impairment. Creatinine elevation has been commonly reported with encorafenib as single agent or in combination with binimetinib. Observed cases of renal failure including acute kidney injury and renal impairment were generally associated with vomiting and dehydration. Other contributing factors included diabetes and hypertension. Blood creatinine should be monitored as clinically indicated and creatinine elevation managed with dose modification or discontinuation. Patients should ensure adequate fluid intake during treatment.
As encorafenib is primarily metabolised and eliminated via the liver, patients with mild to severe hepatic impairment may have increased encorafenib exposure over the range of inter-subject variability exposure.
In the absence of clinical data, encorafenib is not recommended in patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment. Administration of encorafenib should be undertaken with caution at a reduced dose in patients with mild hepatic impairment. Closer monitoring of encorafenib related toxicities in patients with mild hepatic impairment is recommended, including clinical examination and liver function tests, with assessment of ECGs as clinically appropriate during treatment.
There are no data on the effects of encorafenib on fertility in humans. Based on findings in animals, the use of encorafenib may impact fertility in males of reproductive potential. As the clinical relevance of this is unknown, male patients should be informed of the potential risk for impaired spermatogenesis.
Encorafenib potentially inhibits a number of transporters. Agents that are substrates of the hepatic transporters OATP1B1, OATP1B3, OCT1 (such as atorvastatin, bosentan) may have increased exposure and should be therefore co-administered with caution.
Encorafenib potentially inhibits a number of transporters. Agents that are substrates of renal transporters OAT1, OAT3, OCT2 (such as furosemide, penicillin) may have increased exposure and should be therefore co-administered with caution.
Encorafenib is an inhibitor of UGT1A1. Concomitant agents that are substrates of UGT1A1 (e.g. raltegravir, atorvastatin, dolutegravir) may have increased exposure and should be therefore administered with caution.
LVD defined as symptomatic or asymptomatic decreases in ejection fraction has been reported when encorafenib is used in combination with binimetinib.
It is recommended that left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is assessed by echocardiogram or multi-gated acquisition (MUGA) scan before initiation of encorafenib and binimetinib, one month after initiation, and then at approximately 3-month intervals or more frequently as clinically indicated, while on treatment.
The safety of encorafenib in combination with binimetinib has not been established in patients with a baseline LVEF that is either below 50% or below the institutional lower limits of normal. Therefore, in these patients, binimetinib should be used with caution and for any symptomatic left ventricular dysfunction, Grade 3-4 LVEF or for absolute decrease of LVEF from baseline of ≥10%, binimetinib and encorafenib should be discontinued and LVEF should be evaluated every 2 weeks until recovery.
There are no data from the use of encorafenib in pregnant women. Studies in animals have shown reproductive toxicity. Encorafenib is not recommended during pregnancy and in women of childbearing potential not using contraception. If encorafenib is used during pregnancy or if the patient becomes pregnant while taking encorafenib, the patient should be informed of the potential hazard to the foetus.
It is unknown whether encorafenib or its metabolites are excreted in human milk. A risk to the newborns/infants cannot be excluded. A decision must be made whether to discontinue breast-feeding or to discontinue encorafenib therapy taking into account the benefit of breast-feeding for the child and the benefit of therapy for the mother.
Women of childbearing potential must use effective contraception during treatment with encorafenib and for at least 1 month following the last dose. Encorafenib may decrease the efficacy of hormonal contraceptives. Therefore, female patients using hormonal contraception are advised to use an additional or alternative method such as a barrier method (e.g. condom) during treatment with encorafenib and for at least 1 month following the last dose.
There are no data on the effects of encorafenib on fertility in humans. Based on findings in animals, the use of encorafenib may impact fertility in males of reproductive potential. As the clinical relevance of this is unknown, male patients should be informed of the potential risk for impaired spermatogenesis.
Encorafenib has minor influence on the ability to drive or use machines. Visual disturbances have been reported in some patients treated with encorafenib during clinical studies. Patients should be advised not to drive or use machines if they experience visual disturbances or any other adverse reactions that may affect their ability to drive and use machines.
The safety of encorafenib (450 mg orally once daily) in combination with binimetinib (45 mg orally twice daily) was evaluated in 274 patients with BRAF V600 mutant unresectable or metastatic melanoma (hereafter referred to as the pooled Combo 450 population), based on two Phase II studies (CMEK162X2110 and CLGX818X2109) and one Phase III study (CMEK162B2301, Part 1). At the recommended dose (n=274) in patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma, the most common adverse reactions (>25%) occurring in patients treated with encorafenib administered with binimetinib were fatigue, nausea, diarrhoea, vomiting, retinal detachment, abdominal pain, arthralgia, blood CK increased and myalgia.
The safety of encorafenib (300 mg orally once daily) in combination with binimetinib (45 mg orally twice daily) was evaluated in 257 patients with BRAF V600 mutant unresectable or metastatic melanoma (hereafter referred to as the Combo 300 population), based on the Phase III study (CMEK162B2301, Part 2). The most common adverse reactions (>25%) occurring in patients treated with encorafenib 300 mg administered with binimetinib were fatigue, nausea and diarrhoea.
The encorafenib single agent (300 mg orally once daily) safety profile is based on data from 217 patients with unresectable or metastatic BRAF V600-mutant melanoma (hereafter referred to as the pooled encorafenib 300 population). The most common adverse drug reactions (ADRs) (>25%) reported with encorafenib 300 were hyperkeratosis, alopecia, PPES, fatigue, rash, arthralgia, dry skin, nausea, myalgia, headache, vomiting and pruritus.
Adverse reactions are listed below by MedDRA body system organ class and the following frequency convention: very common (≥1/10), common (≥1/100 to <1/10), uncommon (≥1/1,000 to <1/100), rare (≥1/10,000 to <1/1,000), very rare (<1/10,000), not known (cannot be estimated from the available data).
Within each frequency grouping, adverse reactions are presented in order of decreasing seriousness.
Adverse reactions:
Frequency | Encorafenib single agent 300 mg (n=217) | Encorafenib 450 mg in combination with binimetinib (n=274) |
---|---|---|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified | ||
Very common | Skin papilloma*, Melanocytic nevus | |
Common | cuSCCa, New Primary Melanoma* | cuSCCa, Basal cell carcinoma*, Skin papilloma* |
Uncommon | Basal cell carcinoma | |
Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ||
Very common | Anaemia | |
Immune system disorders | ||
Common | Hypersensitivityb | Hypersensitivityb |
Metabolism and nutrition disorders | ||
Very common | Decreased appetite | |
Psychiatric disorders | ||
Very common | Insomnia | |
Nervous system disorders | ||
Very common | Headache*, Neuropathy peripheral*, Dysgeusia* | Neuropathy peripheral*, Dizziness*, Headache |
Common | Facial paresisc | Dysgeusia* |
Uncommon | Facial paresisc | |
Eye disorders | ||
Very common | Visual impairment*, RPED* | |
Common | Uveitis* | |
Uncommon | Uveitis* | |
Cardiac disorders | ||
Common | Supraventricular tachycardiad | LVDη |
Vascular disorders | ||
Very common | Haemorrhagei, Hypertension* | |
Common | VTEi | |
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||
Very common | Nausea, Vomiting*, Constipation | Nausea, Vomiting*, Constipation, Abdominal pain*, Diarrhoea* |
Common | Colitisk | |
Uncommon | Pancreatitis* | Pancreatitis* |
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | ||
Very common | PPES, Hyperkeratosis*, Rash*, Dry skin*, Pruritus*, Alopecia*, Erythemae, Skin hyperpigmentation* | Hyperkeratosis*, Rash*, Dry skin*, Pruritus*, Alopecia |
Common | Dermatitis acneiform*, Skin exfoliationf, Photosensitivity* | Dermatitis acneiform*, PPES, Erythema*, Panniculitis*, Photosensitivity |
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||
Very common | Arthralgia*, Myalgiag, Pain in extremity, Back pain | Arthralgia*, Muscular disorders/Myalgial, Pain in extremity, Back pain |
Common | Arthritis* | |
Uncommon | Rhabdomyolysis | |
Renal and urinary disorders | ||
Common | Renal failure* | Renal failure* |
General disorders and administration site conditions | ||
Very common | Fatigue*, Pyrexia* | Fatigue*, Pyrexia*, Peripheral oedemam |
Investigations | ||
Very common | Gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) increased* | Blood creatine phosphokinase increased, Gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) increased*, Transaminase increased* |
Common | Transaminase increased*, Blood creatinine increased*, Lipase increased | Blood alkaline phosphatase increased, Blood creatinine increased*, Amylase increased, Lipase increased |
Uncommon | Amylase increased |
* composite terms which included more than one preferred term
a includes keratoacanthoma, squamous cell carcinoma, lip squamous cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of skin
b includes angioedema, drug hypersensitivity, hypersensitivity, hypersensitivity vasculitis and urticaria
c includes facial nerve disorder, facial paralysis, facial paresis
d includes extrasystoles, sinus tachycardia, supraventricular extrasystoles, tachyarrhythmia, tachycardia
e includes erythema, generalised erythema, plantar erythema
f includes dermatitis exfoliative, skin exfoliation, exfoliative rash
g includes myalgia, muscle fatigue, muscle injury, muscle spasm, muscle weakness
h includes left ventricular dysfunction, ejection fraction decreased, cardiac failure and ejection fraction abnormal
i includes haemorrhage at various sites including cerebral haemorrhage
j includes pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, embolism, thrombophlebitis, thrombophlebitis superficial and thrombosis
k includes colitis, colitis ulcerative, enterocolitis and proctitis
l includes myalgia, muscular weakness, muscle spasm, muscle injury, myopathy, myositis
m includes fluid retention, peripheral oedema, localised oedema
When encorafenib was used at a dose of 300 mg once daily in combination with binimetinib 45 mg twice daily (Combo 300) in study CMEK162B2301-Part 2, the frequency category was lower compared to the pooled Combo 450 population for the following adverse reactions: anemia, peripheral neuropathy, haemorrhage, hypertension, pruritus (common); and colitis, increased amylase and increased lipase (uncommon).
In the pooled Combo 450 population, cuSCC including keratoacanthomas was observed in 3.3% (9/274) of patients. The median time to onset of the first event of cuSCC (all grades) was 6.5 months (range 1.0 to 22.8 months).
In the pooled encorafenib 300 population, cuSCC was reported in 7.4% (16/217) patients. For patients in the Phase III study (CMEK162B2301) who developed cuSCC, the median time to onset of the first event of cuSCC (all grades) was 2.3 months (range 0.3 to 12.0 months).
In the pooled encorafenib 300 population, new primary melanoma events occurred in 4.1% of patients (9 /217) and was reported as Grade 1 in 1.4% (3/217) of patients, Grade 2 in 2.1% (4/217) of patients, Grade 3 in 0.5% (1/217) of patients and Grade 4 in 0.5% (1/217) of patients.
In the pooled Combo 450 population, uveitis was reported in 4.4% (12/274) of patients, and was Grade 1 in 0.4% (1/274), Grade 2 in 3.6% (10/274) and Grade 3 in 0.4% (1/274). Visual impairment, including blurred vision and reduced visual acuity, occurred in 21.5% (59/274) of patients. Uveitis and visual impairment were generally reversible. RPED occurred in 29.6% (81/274) of patients, most of them had Grade 1-2 and 1.8% (5/274) had Grade 3 events.
In Study CMEK162B2301-Part 2, in the Combo 300 arm, RPED was observed in 12.5% (32/257) of patients with 0.4% (1/257) Grade 4 event.
LVD was reported when encorafenib is used in combination with binimetinib.
Haemorrhagic events were observed in 17.9% (49/274) of patients in the pooled Combo 450 population. Most events were Grade 1 or 2 (14.6%) and 3.3% were Grade 3-4 events. Few patients required dose interruptions or dose reductions (0.7% or 2/274). Haemorrhagic events led to discontinuation of treatment in 1.1% (3/274) of patients. The most frequent haemorrhagic events were haematuria in 3.3% (9/274) of patients, rectal haemorrhage in 2.9% (8/274) and haematochezia in 2.9% (8/274) of patients. Fatal gastric ulcer haemorrhage, with multiple organ failure as a concurrent cause of death, occurred in one patient. Cerebral haemorrhage was reported in 1.5% (4/274) of patients, with fatal outcome in 3 patients. All events occurred in the setting of new or progressive brain metastases.
In Study CMEK162B2301-Part 2, in the Combo 300 arm, haemorrhagic events were observed in 6.6% (17/257) of patients and were Grade 3-4 in 1.6% (4/257) of patients.
Hypertension was reported when encorafenib was used in combination with binimetinib.
VTE was reported when encorafenib is used in combination with binimetinib.
Pancreatic enzyme elevation, mostly asymptomatic, was reported in the pooled Combo 450 population. Amylase and lipase elevations were reported in 3.3% (9/274) and 5.1% (14/274) of patients, respectively. Pancreatitis was reported in 0.7% (2/274) of patients. Both patients experienced Grade 3 events. Pancreatitis led to dose interruption or adjustment in (0.4%) 1/274 of patients.
In the pooled Combo 450 population, rash occurred in 19.7% (54/274) of patients. Most events were mild, with Grade 3 or 4 events reported in 0.7% (2/274) of patients. Rash led to discontinuation in 0.4% (1/274) patients and to dose interruption or dose modification in 1.1% (3/274) of patients.
In the pooled encorafenib 300 population, rash was reported in 43.3% (94/217) of patients. Most events were mild, with Grade 3 or 4 events reported in 4.6% (10/217) of patients. Rash led to discontinuation in 0.5% (1/217) of patients and to dose interruption or dose modification in 7.4% (16/217) of patients.
PPES was reported in 6.2% (17/274) of patients in the pooled Combo 450 population. All the PPES adverse reactions were either Grade 1 (3.3%) or Grade 2 (2.9%). Dose interruption or dose modification occurred in 1.1% (3/274) of patients.
In the Combo 300 arm in Part 2 of the pivotal study, PPES was observed in 3.9% (10/257) of patients with Grade 3 reported in 0.4% (1/257) of patients.
In the pooled encorafenib 300 population, PPES was reported in 51.6% (112/217) of patients. Most events were mild-moderate: Grade 1 in 12.4% (27/217) of patients, Grade 2 in 26.7% (58/217) and Grade 3 in 12.4% (27/217) of patients. PPES led to discontinuation in 4.1% (9/217) of patients and to dose interruption or dose modification in 23.0% (50/217) of patients.
Dermatitis acneiform was reported when encorafenib is used in combination with binimetinib.
In the pooled Combo 450 population, photosensitivity was observed in 4.0% (11/274) of patients. Most events were Grade 1-2, with Grade 3 reported in 0.4% (1/274) of patients and no event led to discontinuation. Dose interruption or dose modification was reported in 0.4% (1/274) of patients.
In the pooled encorafenib 300 population, photosensitivity was reported in 4.1% (9/217) of patients. All events were Grade 1-2. No event required discontinuation, dose modification or interruption.
In the pooled Combo 450 population, facial paresis occurred in 0.7% (2/274) of patients including Grade 3 in 0.4% (1/274) of patients. The events were reversible, and no event led to treatment discontinuation. Dose interruption or modification was reported in 0.4% (1/274) of patients.
In the pooled encorafenib 300 population, facial paresis was observed in 7.4% (16/217) of patients. Most events were mild-moderate: Grade 1 in 2.3% (5/217); Grade 2 in 3.7% (8/217) and Grade 3 in 1.4% (3/217) of patients. The median time to onset of the first event of facial paresis was 0.3 months (range 0.1 to 12.1 months). Facial paresis was generally reversible and led to treatment discontinuation in 0.9% (2/217). Dose interruption or modification was reported in 3.7% (8/217) and symptomatic treatment including corticosteroids was reported in 5.1% (11/217) of patients.
CK elevation and rhabdomyolysis occurred when encorafenib is used in combination with binimetinib.
In the pooled Combo 450 population, mild, mostly Grade 1, asymptomatic blood creatinine elevation was noted in 6.2% (17/274) of patients treated with the Combo 450 mg. The incidence of Grade 3 or 4 elevation was 0.7% (2/274). Renal failure events, including acute kidney injury and renal impairment, were reported in 3.3% (9/274) patients treated with encorafenib and binimetinib with Grade 3 or 4 events in 2.2% (6/274) of patients. Renal failure was generally reversible with dose interruption, rehydration and other general supportive measures.
The incidences of liver laboratory abnormalities reported in the pooled Combo 450 population are listed below:
In Study CMEK162B2301-Part 2, in the Combo 300 arm, the incidence of liver laboratory abnormalities was:
In the pooled Combo 450 population, diarrhoea was observed in 38% (104/274) of patients and was Grade 3-4 in 3.3% (9/274) patients. Diarrhoea led to dose discontinuation in 0.4% of patients and to dose interruption or dose modification in 4.4% of patients. Constipation occurred in 24.1% (66/274) of patients and was Grade 1 or 2. Abdominal pain was reported in 27.4% (75/274) of patients and was Grade 3 in 2.6% (7/274) patients. Nausea occurred in 41.6% (114/274) with Grade 3 or 4 observed in 2.6% (7/274) of patients. Vomiting occurred in 28.1% (77/274) of patients with Grade 3 or 4 reported in 2.2% (6/274) of patients.
In Study CMEK162B2301-Part 2, in the Combo 300 arm, nausea was observed in 27.2% (70/257) of patients and was Grade 3 in 1.6% (4/257) of patients. Vomiting occurred in 15.2% (39/257) of patients with Grade 3 reported in 0.4% (1/257) of patients. Diarrhoea occurred in 28.4% (73/257) of patients with Grade 3 reported in 1.6% (4/257) of patients.
Gastrointestinal disorders were typically managed with standard therapy.
In the pooled Combo 450 population, anaemia was reported in 19.7% (54/274) of patients; 4.7% (13/274) patients had a Grade 3 or 4. No patients discontinued treatment due to anaemia, 1.5% (4/274) required dose interruption or dose modification.
In Study CMEK162B2301-Part 2, in the Combo 300 arm, anaemia was observed in 9.7% (25/257) of patients with Grade 3-4 reported in 2.7% (7/257) patients.
In the pooled Combo 450 population, headache occurred in 21.5% (59/274) of patients, including Grade 3 in 1.5% (4/274) of patients. In Study CMEK162B2301-Part 2, in the Combo 300 arm, headache was reported in 12.1% (31/257) of patients and was Grade 3 in 0.4% (1/257) of patients.
In the pooled Combo 450 population, fatigue occurred in 43.8% (120/274) of patients including Grade 3 in 2.9% (8/274) of patients. In Study CMEK162B2301-Part 2, in the Combo 300 arm, fatigue was observed in 33.5% (86/257) of patients with 1.6% (4/257) Grade 3-4 events.
In patients treated with Combo 450 (n=274), 194 patients (70.8%) were <65 years old, 65 patients (23.7%) were 65-74 years old and 15 patients (5.5%) were aged >75. No overall differences in safety or efficacy were observed between elderly patients (≥65) and younger patients. The proportions of patients experiencing adverse events (AE) and serious adverse events (SAE) were similar in patients aged <65 years and those aged ≥65 years. The most common AEs reported with a higher incidence in patients aged ≥65 years compared to patients aged <65 years included diarrhoea, pruritus, GGT and blood phosphatase alkaline elevation. In the small group of patients aged ≥75 years (n=15), patients were more likely to experience serious adverse events and adverse events leading to discontinuation of treatment.
© All content on this website, including data entry, data processing, decision support tools, "RxReasoner" logo and graphics, is the intellectual property of RxReasoner and is protected by copyright laws. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of any part of this content without explicit written permission from RxReasoner is strictly prohibited. Any third-party content used on this site is acknowledged and utilized under fair use principles.